Prediction of Ann Kiyomura Hayashi vs Pam Shriver Head-to-Head, At
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
A. Kiyomura Hayashi vs P. Shriver

Ann Kiyomura Hayashi
USA
l
l
w
l
w
l
l
l
l
l
2
Win
6
Played
4
Win
70
Age
63
-
Height
1.83m
Ret.
C. Rank
Ret.
63
Best Rank
3
1
Total Titles
25
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
Right-handed

Pam Shriver
USA
l
l
w
l
l
l
w
w
l
w
2
Win
6
Played
4
Win
70
Age
63
-
Height
1.83m
Ret.
C. Rank
Ret.
63
Best Rank
3
1
Total Titles
25
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
Right-handed
Head-to-head: Hayashi 2 - 4 Shriver
They have played 12 sets in total, with Ann Kiyomura Hayashi winning 5 and Pam Shriver winning 7. The last match between Pam Shriver and Ann Kiyomura Hayashi was at the Atlanta, 25-04-1983, Round: R4, Surface: Hard, with Draw getting the victory W/O.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Hayashi | 2 |
| Shriver | 4 |
Last 6 H2H Matches:
(R4) Atlanta(04-25-83)
Pam Shriver
Ann Kiyomura Hayashi
(R3) Sydney(11-22-82)
Ann Kiyomura Hayashi
6
6
Pam Shriver
4
2
(SF) Perth 2(11-16-81)
Pam Shriver
6
6
Ann Kiyomura Hayashi
3
1
A. K. Hayashi vs P. Shriver H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 48.87% (216-226) | Career Total W/L | 69.49% (665-292) |
| 1 | Grass | 1 |
| 0 | Hard | 1 |
| 1 | Indoor | 2 |
| 1 | Titles | 0 |
| 2 | Total H2H Matches | 4 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
A. K. Hayashi vs P. Shriver Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Ann Kiyomura Hayashi has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Pam Shriver has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Ann Kiyomura Hayashi, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Pam Shriver has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Ann Kiyomura Hayashi has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Pam Shriver has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Ann Kiyomura Hayashi has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Pam Shriver winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Ann Kiyomura Hayashi has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 19/15), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 50% (W/L 51/50). Pam Shriver has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 56% (W/L 160/40), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 16/11).
- Player level: In the last year, Ann Kiyomura Hayashi has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Pam Shriver has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 6 times before with Ann Kiyomura Hayashi winning 2 times and Pam Shriver being victorious 3 times. They have played 12 sets in total, with Ann Kiyomura Hayashi winning 5 and Pam Shriver winning 7.
- The last match between Ann Kiyomura Hayashi and Pam Shriver was at the Atlanta, 25-04-1983, Round: R4, Surface: Hard, with Draw getting the victory W/O.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Ann Kiyomura Hayashi and Pam Shriver have played a deciding set 2 times, with Ann Kiyomura Hayashi winning 1 times and Pam Shriver 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Ann Kiyomura Hayashi winning 1, and Pam Shriver 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Ann Kiyomura Hayashi has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Pam Shriver has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Ann Kiyomura Hayashi has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Pam Shriver has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Ann Kiyomura Hayashi has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Pam Shriver has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Ann Kiyomura Hayashi vs Pam Shriver Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
A. K. Hayashi vs P. Shriver H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches Won | 3 |
| 5 | Sets Won | 7 |
| 54 | Games Won | 61 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 40% (2/5) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 60% (3/5) |
| 50% (1/2) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 67% (2/3) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (2/2) |
| 33% (1/3) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/2) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 33% (1/3) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Hayashi 0%, Shriver 0%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Hayashi 0%, Shriver 0%.
Break Points Saved %: Hayashi 0%, Shriver 0%.
A. K. Hayashi Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | L | 1-6 7-5 6-3 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-2 6-0 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-2 6-3 | ||
R1 | L | 6-0 6-2 | ||
R2 | L | 6-2 6-2 | ||
P. Shriver Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | W | 6-4 6-3 | ||
R1 | W | 7-5 6-7(4) 6-3 | ||
QF | L | 7-5 7-6(1) | ||
R4 | L | 6-3 6-0 | ||
R3 | W | 6-2 6-7 6-3 | ||

A. K. Hayashi vs P. Shriver Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 48.87% (216/226) | YTD Win/Loss | 69.49% (665/292) |
| 49.01% (497/517) | Sets Win/Loss | 67.69% (1427/681) |
| 49.14% (4526/4684) | Games Win/Loss | 57.47% (11077/8197) |
| 50.50% (51/50) | Hard Win/Loss | 66.98% (142/70) |
| 55.88% (19/15) | Clay Win/Loss | 59.26% (16/11) |
| 43.24% (64/84) | Indoor Hard W/L | 66.18% (225/115) |
| 52.81% (47/42) | Grass Win/Loss | 80.00% (160/40) |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 144.76 | Average Opponent Rank | 265.91 |
| 37.50% (3/5) | Slam W/L | 63.33% (19/11) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 91.67% (11/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 66.67% (2/1) |
| 100.00% (5/0) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 46.43% (26/30) | Futures W/L | 67.68% (111/53) |
| 49% (211/431) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 70% (657/937) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 50% (4/8) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 55% (12/22) |
| 50% (73/145) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (111/220) |
| 80% (227/181) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 92% (647/595) |
| 20% (227/46) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 8% (647/52) |
| 15% (209/31) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (299/64) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
04:00 AM 21/11/25
Prediction04:00 PM 20/11/25
Prediction12:00 PM 21/11/25
Prediction01:25 PM 20/11/25
Prediction05:00 PM 20/11/25
Prediction02:35 PM 20/11/25
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips

20 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Jaume Antoni Munar Clar vs Jiri Lehecka Prediction – ATP Davis Cup, World Group, QF, ESP – 20th November 2025 Best Bets

20 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →LP Open by IND – Colina Preview And Prediction: Laura Pigossi vs Leolia Jeanjean Betting Tips & Picks November 20, 2025

20 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Oksana Selekhmeteva vs Noma Akugue Noha Prediction – WTA W75 Petange – 20th November 2025 Best Bets

20 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Kimberly Birrell vs Miho Kuramochi Prediction – WTA W75 Sydney – 20th November 2025 Best Bets

19 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Miriam Bianca Bulgaru vs Mayar Sherif Prediction – WTA LP Open by IND – 19th November 2025 Best Bets

19 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Flavio Cobolli vs Filip Misolic Prediction – ATP Davis Cup, World Group, QF, ITA – 19th November 2025 Best Bets
Top Predictions Today
14:35
H2H 0-2
17:00
H2H 0-0
17:00
H2H 0-0
20:00
H2H 0-0
20:00
H2H 0-0
Tennis Events This Week
Davis Cup, World Group, QF, ESP-CZE
Italy
Bergamo Challenger
Italy
Florianopolis Challenger
Brazil
Guayaquil Challenger
Ecuador
Montemar Challenger
Spain
Soma Bay Challenger
Egypt
Sydney Challenger
Australia
Yokohama Challenger
Japan
M15 Alcala de Henares
Spain
M15 Monastir
Tunisia
M15 Olavarria
Argentina
M15 Santiago
Chile
M15 Tallahassee
United States
M25 Austin
United States
M25 Cochabamba
Bolivia
M25 Luanda
Angola
M25 Vale do Lobo
Portugal